🔗 Share this article

The ninth circuit court has maintained a ban on deploying state troops in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Appeals Court Concurs to Rehear Case

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on Tuesday that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the executive power with an expanded group of 11 judges. The court also overturned a earlier decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the administration.

Ongoing Dispute Over Troop Deployment

This order represents the most recent development in a long-running court case over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to deploy state military units in the city. Approximately two hundred troops have been in limbo since late September when the deployment effort was initiated in response to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has argued that government employees at the ICE facility in the southern part of the city were under attack, while local authorities maintain that municipal police have control of the situation.

Contrary to characterizations of the city as “war ravaged”, locals have been sharing videos of scenic paths and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning activities such as an Emergency Naked Bike Ride against the “militarization of our city”.

Recent Legal Actions

The appeals court decision came after a US district judge in the city issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federalization of the Oregon national guard, and another stopping the deployment of any military personnel in the state, after attempts to circumvent the initial injunction by mobilizing out-of-state forces.

On the previous day, the appeals court had put the first ruling on hold – allowing control of state troops – but the second ruling remained in place, blocking the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the issue will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under review together – by a panel of 11 judges.

“This decision shows that facts are important and that the courts are striving to ensure government responsibility. The founding document restricts the executive authority, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” said the state attorney general in a statement.

“The court is sending a definite signal: the president cannot dispatch the military into US cities without cause. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, values, and autonomy as this case moves forward and our fight continues in the judicial system.”